SoftwareTipsandTricks Forum

Go Back   SoftwareTipsandTricks Forum > Hardware > Hardware Advice
User Name
Password


CPU Question

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes

  #1  
Old 04-10-2006, 02:09 PM
cantdrive55 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 82
Send a message via AIM to cantdrive55
CPU Question

I dont know which I would rather do. I am thinking about getting either a dual CPU mobo and run twin AMD64 2800+ CPU's or run a intel P4 3.0GHz socket 775 mobo.

What do you guys think is better? I'm looking for a fast computer to do alot of online things but not too much gaming. Thanks for any advice!
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 04-11-2006, 05:01 PM
Overclocked Doc Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 706
I would be looking into the latest generation of "dual core" CPU's from either Intel or AMD. Although at this point in time there aren't a lot of software and or programs that support (make full use of) they are wonderful for "Multi tasking". You can literally run one program (say video encoding) with one core and play games with the other. My next build (for me personally) will most likely be an Intel pentium "D" 930. This will give me comparible performance to what I currently run (P4 3.0E) but with "twin cores". I do game alot but also find the need to do other tasks at the same time. Prelimanary tests I have run using a Pentium "D" 805 lead me to believe that I will infact, be able to pay BF2 and encode video at the same time. The other cool thing (for me personally) is that they overclock extremely well.
__________________
"I just read your post!"
www.overclockeddoc.com
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 05-03-2006, 04:40 PM
IneRtia dRaft's Avatar
IneRtia dRaft Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 467
dual cores are the hot stuff now in cpu choices. like what overclock said "multi-task" without any lag or issues. for me i can be burning files to dvd-blanks while playing cs, hl2 and etc. very great for multi-tasking users. like overclock said not many programs take advantage of the 64 bit dual core. yet there is the 64bit windows XP operating system which I DONT RECOMMEND. Just my opinion. I'm waiting for Windows Vista.

If this pc is used for work/office work and etc any intel dual cores would be a good choice (depending on your budget)

for me i use my pc for gaming and working. but i've been sticking with AMD for a while so it's kind of weird for me to switch.
__________________
BFG 550 Watts PSU, Asus A8N SLi Premium, 2GB Corsair XMS, AMD 64 X2 4400+ 1MB Cache, Plextor DVD+-RW, eVga 7900 GTX 512MB
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 05-06-2006, 08:45 AM
Overclocked Doc Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 706
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtimer
You need hyperthreading Technology.
This allows for more mutitasking capability.
This appears to be your goal,right ?


Hyper threading doesn't even remotely come close to what running a "dual core" can offer.
__________________
"I just read your post!"
www.overclockeddoc.com
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question about reformating scorp132 Windows XP 22 03-25-2006 11:02 AM
Windows question Coldlife Windows XP 2 08-08-2005 10:47 AM
Quick CPU question? eckans2 Hardware Problems 2 04-04-2005 07:38 AM
Probably a silly question regarding XP logon screen Van Windows XP 7 03-08-2005 11:32 AM
Question on RAM and Motherboards anniehoang Hardware Problems 4 09-20-2003 01:01 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Designed by eXtremepixels. Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.