09:29 17/02/2009
Another thought. I suppose the fact that we now know that bios
recognizes the replaced ram, does not in itself mean in itself that XP OS actually 'manages' this extra ram (which it does not recognize in the first place)
Does it make sense 'to assume' that this newly added ram is nevertheless operative, does makes a difference, can help w sw like resource-hungry Photoshop v 7 which I also installed
In the below cited vidéo, an American technicien, who replaced ram on an Asus netbook (not my modèle); demonstrated by screen display that the newly installed ram was bios-recognized but he mentioned something about a "kernel" needing modif, because if I understood him correctly, the OS didn't recognize the extra ram. He spoke so quickly. Where can this kernel lodge?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3i3_T...eature=related
Me, being one year shy of 80, my mind's no longer capable of
following all this. Thanks again and
All the best,
G