SoftwareTipsandTricks Forum

Go Back   SoftwareTipsandTricks Forum > Hardware > Hardware Problems
User Name
Password


dual channel memory speed

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes

  #1  
Old 10-02-2004, 04:49 PM
winxpuser333 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 13
dual channel memory speed

I have amd 3200+ cpu on motherboard abit nf7-s2 with dual channel support
and 2 identical memory sticks each 512MB DDR400.

When I ran the latest sisoft sandra, it reports:

Quote:
memory bus speed 2x200MHz (400MHz data rate)

But I have DDR400...
Does it mean that each memory stick should work at 400MHz and NOT at 200 as reported by sisoft sandra?
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 10-07-2004, 04:49 PM
THE_ONE_IS_IN's Avatar
THE_ONE_IS_IN Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 25
on some motherboards you need to go into the bios and activate the dual channel slots. Give it a try.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 10-11-2004, 01:27 AM
Zxian's Avatar
Zxian Offline
Canadian to the max!
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In order to ease calculations, we will approximate this horse as a sphere
Posts: 314
This is an ever growing problem with people and the numbers that they buy.

When you go and buy a P4-HT based computer that claims to have an 800 MHz Front Side Bus, the system bus is actually only working at 400 MHz, but because of a tricky way that Intel counts clock cycles, it comes out as double.

Same deal with DDR RAM. DDR RAM stands for Double Data Rate Random Access Memory, which means that it will transfer data when you go from a 0 to 1, and from 1 to 0, essentially doubling the rate at which you can transfer data. The actual clock speed of the Ram IS 200 MHz, but because we get the data transfer twice each clock cycle, they SAY 400.

Just another point to add to this... Numbers don't really mean all that much. When you look at the actual clock speeds of AMD CPUs, you'll quickly see that they are lower than the clock speeds of Intel chips. This does not mean, however, that AMD chips are slower. On the contrary, some people have found that for similarly priced CPUs, AMD Athlons will run faster than Intel P4's. Furthermore, Mac G4 processors running at 1.25 GHz, will CREAM any Intel P4 chip at about 2 GHz. Don't even get me started on 2.0 GHz G5's.... *drools*

When you look at Sony's Playstation2 and MS's XBox, you'll see that the processors in the two systems are rated at 300 MHz, and 733 MHz. BUT.... the PlayStation2 can produce MUCH more vivid video and handle much more intensive processes than the XBox can, because of the way that the processor works. MS basically threw together a cheap computer, put a basic OS in there (and I mean basic...), and sold it on the market as a gaming console, while playing the number game on the market.

Basically what I'm saying is that the numbers don't really mean all that much in the end. As long as your computer works the way you want it to, that's all that's important.

Hope this all makes sense.

Cheers.
__________________
You can't poke someone with an infinite rod.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual channel (ram) TAPION Hardware Advice 31 11-12-2007 04:45 AM
Dual Channel Ram sscamaro_510 Windows XP 1 05-26-2007 02:30 PM
Looking up RAM DJ Apexx Hardware Problems 12 03-31-2004 11:30 AM
Dual Channel Ram sscamaro_510 Hardware Advice 2 03-23-2004 01:39 PM
Dual channel function BROXI_BEAR Hardware Problems 0 02-26-2004 10:53 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:41 PM.


Designed by eXtremepixels. Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.