Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fritzi93
Look, pal, you have a history of disrespectful, bullying posts. Debate the issue without getting personal.
|
Really? You went through six years of back posts? Better report my bullying to the staff. Though I think you will find anything classed as a negative will equal less than 1% ok? In fact, point me to one.
I didn't get personal, you are forcing US law on me as if I am bound by it:
Quote:
|
Section 117 is a limitation on the rights granted to holders of copyright on computer programs.
|
Made by US congress, unless I'm mistaken. Rellevent to me? Not really.
Quote:
|
There are many US members here. For you to say something's illegal with the implication it's illegal EVERYWHERE and for all forum members is plainly false.
|
I didn't say or even imply anything, you did. See paragraph above.
The rest is non rellevent, exept for this:
Quote:
|
it may not be in the interests of this forum to discuss specifics of DRM circumvention.
|
I expect giving instructions on copying a disk with names of explicit tools and their purpose, as you did is ok then. Except your instructions can now be used to copy a CD/DVD that may be DRM protected, right?
It's still copyright protection regardless of name, so where's the difference in attitude coming from now?
Get the gist of my initial reaction yet??
I will appologise to the OP for sending this thread off track, but that is all.
__________________
Where there's a will, There's a way.
Pay developers, not Rapidshare!
I know nowt, but at least I'm trying.
Quality, not quantity.
Prevention is better than cure.
Linear Mode
