SoftwareTipsandTricks Forum

Go Back   SoftwareTipsandTricks Forum > Operating Systems > Windows 95/98/ME
User Name
Password


ME with 256Mb memory

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes

  #1  
Old 11-19-2002, 04:12 AM
dave_stuttard Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: manchester england
Posts: 6
Angry ME with 256Mb memory

dave_stuttard@lycos.com A friend has a 'cowboy'-supplied PC, with an 800MHz AMD Duron, 256Mb memory and 20Gb drive. It runs in Windows ME very slowly, despite all the usual precautions such as defragging, installing and running Norton Internet Security 2003 (no virus/trojan found, but trojan attempts are being stopped) and AdAware (147 instances found and deleted, but no doubt some will be returning). Have unticked most of the dross in the config>start files list too and find it hard to believe that these would bite significantly into the available RAM.

I've now been advised of a suggestion that ME paradoxically runs slowly with a memory above a certain size. That's a very interesting thought isn't it, when you're expecting 256Mb of memory to give you SPEED. Can anyone shed any light on this one, with a solution (apart from the obvious one of wiping the drive and installing XP - although I'm drifting towards that anyway)?

Last edited by dave_stuttard : 11-19-2002 at 08:06 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 11-19-2002, 12:42 PM
beeboy Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 949
My experience with ME is that it runs better with system restore removed completely. There is a tool at Cnet downloads that will do this. You are better off backing up the registry before installs as system restore is not reliable. Also, 256 ram should be alright but you can run 500 before you need to edit a system file - over 500 and ME becomes unstable and crashes. I ran 768. XP is definately a big improvement - much more stable and less prone to crash.

Last edited by beeboy : 11-19-2002 at 12:44 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 11-20-2002, 04:42 AM
dave_stuttard Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: manchester england
Posts: 6
Thanks for your thoughts Beeboy. It sounds like having 256 isn't the cause of the problem. However, the System Restore thing smacks of closing the stable door after the horse has bolted or at least doesn't answer the question, don't you think? At least I can conclude that I need to put XP in (That's what I have on my own system and I agree that it is very robust compared with previous Windows OSs). Thanks again.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 02-19-2005, 03:51 AM
acant2000's Avatar
acant2000 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 29
When I installed ME on my PC chips m395dlu with an overclocked intel 2.66 GHz processor because it had only 256 mb ram it didn't install at all. more ram!
__________________
A 2
C 0
A 0
N 0
T A real idiot.
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 02-22-2005, 02:08 AM
freepchelp's Avatar
freepchelp Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by dave_stuttard
dave_stuttard@lycos.com A friend has a 'cowboy'-supplied PC, with an 800MHz AMD Duron, 256Mb memory and 20Gb drive. It runs in Windows ME very slowly, despite all the usual precautions such as defragging, installing and running Norton Internet Security 2003 (no virus/trojan found, but trojan attempts are being stopped) and AdAware (147 instances found and deleted, but no doubt some will be returning). Have unticked most of the dross in the config>start files list too and find it hard to believe that these would bite significantly into the available RAM.

I've now been advised of a suggestion that ME paradoxically runs slowly with a memory above a certain size. That's a very interesting thought isn't it, when you're expecting 256Mb of memory to give you SPEED. Can anyone shed any light on this one, with a solution (apart from the obvious one of wiping the drive and installing XP - although I'm drifting towards that anyway)?


I am aware that me or 98 cant really take advantage of memory over about 128megs, I have never heard of xtra memory slowing it down. Have you run scandisk...maybe there are bad sectors on your drive.

I would expect a pc with your specs to run very well on M.E. The restore feature only really cuts in when the system shuts down, at which time it does a restore point.

Nothing more off putting than a pc that runs below expected spec is their?

I would advise either 2000 of Xp and use ntfs. Me is only a glorifies 98se anyway.

Good luck
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 02-22-2005, 06:00 AM
acant2000's Avatar
acant2000 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: scotland
Posts: 29
I formatted my harddisk, installed 98 se ran scandisk and upgraded but still freezes up.
__________________
A 2
C 0
A 0
N 0
T A real idiot.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Commit charge (memory usage) is increasing but not decreasing Sodom Windows XP 7 08-26-2007 11:21 AM
Please help!!!!! Computer reboots, Memory Dump TheSHRIKE Windows XP 7 05-14-2007 08:38 PM
Virtual Memory (Swap File) I'm confused Plado Windows XP 2 01-06-2005 10:01 AM
Photoshop rajanbd Software Problems and Useful Utilities 5 04-12-2004 02:53 AM
Need Help w/Virtual Memory error BoogieReb Windows XP 3 10-20-2002 02:22 AM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Designed by eXtremepixels. Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.