
08-15-2007, 12:26 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Posts: 516
|
|
Correction: It seems that evidence is mounting that Vista's DRM (HDCP) isn't quite as bad as is commonly believed. Look here:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=284&tag=nl.e539
So the argument about excessive system load may be overstated.
Nevertheless, it DOES have higher hardware requirements, especially RAM.
I ask myself what an OS is for. It's not an end in itself. Throwing impediments in my way and checking up on me is an unjustified annoyance. For the time being, I'll stick with XP, it does all I need it to. The only reason I haven't switched to Ubuntu completely is the finding of equivalent video apps for Linux. They do exist, but the learning curve to familiarise myself with them is time I haven't been able to spare. BTW, the Beryl desktop blows Vista's Aero away. 
__________________
Pull! Bang! Darn!
|

08-15-2007, 07:00 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,680
|
|
Keep in mind that Vista was written with "the worst case user scenario" in mind. Those with more computer knowledge can just disable UAC and go on.
I think that Microsoft finally realized their operating systems were getting blamed for the problems caused by malware. It's the popularity of their operating systems that caused Windows to be targeted by the malware writers but most users don't know that and don't want to know that. They just want to turn the computer on and it works. When it doesn't work, Windows, and Microsoft, gets the blame. It was to Microsoft's benefit to address the malware problem...finally.
What is percieved by some as "throwing impediments in my way" and "checking up" is viewed by people like me with customers like mine as, hopefully, a godsend.
Since I don't charge return customers for phone help, I tell them to call me at the first sign of a problem (or what they percieve to be a problem). If they'd do that, nine times out of ten, it can be fixed over the phone.
However, the only thing that seems to stop them from indiscriminate clicking on and deleting "stuff" they don't understand is a Windows warning message popping up. Vista's UAC throws out enough "warnings" that perhaps they'll stop, think and call for help before clicking on more "stuff" and creating their usual FUBAR. 
|

08-16-2007, 12:40 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Posts: 516
|
|
Yeah, for the majority of users, no doubt you're right. But I find their term "improved security" to be rather Orwellian. Part of it is, of course, for their benefit, not that of the end user. Limited Functionality Mode, for instance; what's in that for me? You've read some of the horror stories, change some hardware, go on vacation, come back and your OS is crippled or dead. No doubt all that stuff about a "kill switch" has been overstated, but there you are.
I'm no pirate. But WGA always irked me, so I went the Windizupdate and Autopatcher route. Security I can handle myself, although of course there are millions of users out there without a clue.
Anyway, as the article states, most of Vista's problems have been due to immature/glitchy drivers. The "average" user will get along okay after the first service pack.
As to DRM/HDCP , perhaps some of the problems with WMP 10 and 11 are attributable to DRM. So, a crummy player is now even worse. [shrugs]. I try to keep up with the latest developments on doom9 (pro video site), and make no mistake, if something can be played, it can be copied. I've busted DRM myself (shhh!) just to verify it can be done and even without that, there's always the analog hole. Pirates will not be deterred by DRM. Yes, make copying a little tougher and the average user won't try to circumvent it. So admittedly there's a useful purpose to DRM from the view of the copyright holder.
Vista is a "no sale" for me, but obviously my own attitudes have a lot to do with it.  The OS on my computer must have only one master: me.
__________________
Pull! Bang! Darn!
|

08-20-2007, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Posts: 516
|
|
The article below addresses some of my gripes:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=696&tag=nl.e550
I also feel Vista is grossly overpriced. M$ has such a dominant market share that they can pretty much dictate the price. Not a good thing in the long run for customers. 
__________________
Pull! Bang! Darn!
|

08-28-2007, 07:13 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Posts: 516
|
|
Eh, since I linked to the Ed Bott article above, might as well link to the Gutman document. He's the guy George Ou and Ed Bott have been crossing swords with lately.
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut00...ista_cost.html
Some of what the guy says should be taken seriously. For instance driver revocation, S/PDIF shutoff, etc. However, his phraseology gets emotional at times, which tends to lessen one's credibility. As an example, he says that Microsoft has fought a superpower to a standstill. Huh? Is he referring to the antitrust suit? I had no idea it was an existential, geopolitical struggle.  Anyway, for those interested, there it is.
__________________
Pull! Bang! Darn!
|

08-29-2007, 02:32 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 909
|
|
|
Well I have had it running on my machine for 5 months and in a VM b4 that, it will improve I would wait till SP1 is released and also a fast PC with 2 gig of ram is sweet!
|

08-29-2007, 09:45 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
|
|
|
My PC has 2 gigs of ram and runs vista flawless. Well Almost.
i have no sound damn it.
lol
|

08-31-2007, 10:33 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Posts: 516
|
|
I'm curious, anyone reading this networking on Vista? How is it working for you? I've read some discouraging things about it:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2170276,00.asp
__________________
Pull! Bang! Darn!
|

09-01-2007, 03:42 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
|
|
|
it ran fine on my p4 3.4ghz with 2gb ram and nvida 8400ogs with scsi hdd.Infact it was even a bit quicker than xp = ).(disabled uac and a few pointless services)
|

09-24-2007, 04:13 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tipperary Ireland
Posts: 2
|
|
|
Vista is trash. The O N L Y reason we have Vista is to give Bill Gates
an extra €10 billion . What is wrong with xp. Maybe the thought there was
weapons of mass distruction hidden in XP
|

09-27-2007, 06:22 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 909
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fritzi93
|
Im running SBS server with 5 PCs 4 xp and 1 Vista. TThe Vista machine works fine on the network. Depends what you know about networking???
|

09-27-2007, 08:27 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London UK
Posts: 369
|
|
heres the new vista add...:-) http://www.vistax64.com/general-disc...ta-advert.html just click on the arrow to load.
__________________
AMD Phenom 64 9850 quad core 2.5 gig Artic 64 cooler HS/F
4 gig DDR2 ram
Nvidia 9600 GT 1gb gigabyte silent PCI-E (upgraded)
sata 360gb HDD 7200
M-audio 2496
Dell silver 22 " widescreen mon
500 watt psu (upgraded) zalman silent PSU
windows xp SP3
windows vista ultimate SP1
internet connection
24 mb D/L LLU 1.5 mb U/L
|

09-27-2007, 11:08 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Posts: 516
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Generator
|
That's damn funny. 
__________________
Pull! Bang! Darn!
|

10-17-2007, 04:57 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
|
|
How do you rate Vista?
I am new to this forum, so I may be missing something. I could be the only person here who likes Vista and has no problems using it... other than "cannot rename folder" ... but after much research and much hair-pulling, I was able to resolve that problem. The only big problem I have had is a driver problem for my Epson printer but, when I finally located and installed the updated driver, all is well again. I am extremely careful what is downloaded to my laptop, and a lot of time is spent toward the end of no spam, no viruses. Some call me paranoid, but I try to research everything before it gets to my laptop, not after!!  The biggest problem I have had with Vista is getting used to the "new, better, and improved" look. During the first few days of using Vista, I set everything possible to "classic look." After those few days, I decided, "If you can't lick 'em, join 'em."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Perseverence... no looking back. 
Last edited by mgcwnd : 10-17-2007 at 05:01 AM.
|

11-22-2007, 03:43 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Posts: 516
|
|
According to the page below, re Vista uptake among IT pros, 90% have "concerns", and 50% have no plans to migrate to Vista:
http://www.computerworlduk.com/manag...fm?newsid=6258
I'm not arguing for or against the validity of the article. Some of the comments/disputes at the bottom of the page are pretty fierce. 
__________________
Pull! Bang! Darn!
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM. |
|
|
|