Ok... to give a somewhat reasonable response.
Yes, we all know that Microsoft Windows has not had a perfect track record. But look at the other possibility. If Apple computers or the Linux operating system were more popular, we would definately see a larger number of security issues for those systems as well. Take a look at what's happening to Firefox at the moment.
Link I can guarantee you that if Apple computers held the same market share as Microsoft does right now, we'd all have just as many problems with OS9 as we did with Pre-SP2 XP. Hackers write malicious code to get noticed, not because they have a "grudge".
OSX and SP2 are both very good operating systems, but on the other hand, Apple computers are still found lacking in general computing speed.
See here.
As for virus protection for Macs, there are AV products for Macs to prevent Macs from infecting PCs. The Macs may not be affected by the viruses themselves, but they can be carriers. AV products are created for Macs to prevent them from infecting PCs.
Quote:
|
Macs OS is open source. This means that if you were to get a virus that your computer would detect the virus and destroy it before it could do any harm to your computer.
|
This is simply wrong. Open Source means that the sourc code (the actual text files that are then converted into a program) is available to the public. I can tell you for a fact that this is not true for OSX.
It was not Microsoft who copied the 64-bit computer, but rather AMD who decided to start developing their AMD64 processor because they thought that the future of computing would head in that direction. Microsoft simply developed a 64-bit operating system (that is soon to be released) to support this new technology. As for the G5 (the 64-bit processor you mentioned) being faster, read the article above.
As for the iMac Mini... it's got very limited hardware and expandability. It's nice for me to be able to go out to the store and pick up a larger hard drive,open up my case, stick in the hard drive, and go. The 1.25GHz G4 is slower than a P4 2.8GHz (not just by numbers, but by crunching power as well) by almost any standard. And.... only 256MB of RAM by default? That will bring OSX to a crawl...get ready to spend the extra $100 (which is a rip off for another 256MB of RAM, btw).
Not to mention the fact that almost all software is more expensive to purchase for a Mac. For a decent system, you still end up paying much more for a Mac than you do for a PC.
I've been using Windows XP since it came out and I've never had any major problems with it as an operating system. All you need to use it is some common sense.