Categories



Windows XP Discussion Forum
Search


Advanced Search
Article Options
Popular Articles
  1. Handwrite for MSN Messenger
  2. Win2000 Logon Screen
  3. Windows XP FAQ T
  4. The difference between 64 and 32 bit processors
  5. Decrypt Encrypted files on Windows XP
No popular articles found.

 »  Home  »  Hardware  »  Difference between Core i7 and Core 2 Duo
Difference between Core i7 and Core 2 Duo
By  Super Admin  | Published  08/17/2008 | Hardware | Rating:
Difference between Core i7 and Core 2 Duo

Intel Core i7

Launch: October 2008

Types: i7 800, i7 900
Speed: 2.6 GHz
Cores: 4
Threads: 8 - Simultaneous Multithreading
Cache: 256 KB L2/core 8 MB shared L3
Memory: Triple channel DDR3 800/1066/1333 MHz

Core i7 is Intel's high end processor range. Core 2 Duo is budget processor range. In between both is Core i5. Core 2 Duo will soon be replaced with Core i3.

Core i7 uses new architecture and offers better performance than all Core 2 Duo processors.

New Features of Core i7
* DDR3
* Turbo Boost (automatic over clocking of up to 300 MHz)
* Hyper Threading (Core 2 Duo has no Hyper Threading)

Recommend to go for Core i7 if you can afford, or else Core i5. If you are in tight budget, Core 2 Duo range is also very good.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Tell us why you rated this way (optional):

Send to Author Post on Site

Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    I agree with #1
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Clicked the link to this article hoping to have some answers at last. Not enough info here though... just barely touches on the basics (& info I already knew--& really, I know verrrrry little about this!).
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    i asked diffr budy nt which 1 is better ?? huh !@#$^()(*%$#&
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Because i know the difference bitween core i7 and core 2 Duo
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    what article....
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    I agree with #1 & #2
     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    poor explanation
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    nothing in it
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    good
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    nice articals
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    This entry did not justify the time it took to read.
     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    No comparison!!??
     
  • Comment #13 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    very less information about it, more needed in simple and explanatory way...... (sushantwb@gmail.com)
     
Submit Comment